Aim
-
An inquiry about the intricate inter-species social arrangement present within the urban.
-
A spatial scrutiny of the urban context to grasp an accurate comprehension of the ways in which the urban is perceived by said street animal.
Dominant Concepts
-
Various paradigms like laws, culture, human values may emphasise on the variety of negotiated spaces and ways of negotiation
-
Rejected material, spaces, items, persons, events are key doorways/barriers which enable/allow/curb interaction
-
Inquiring spatial qualities of the ‘stage’ of interaction, which has an effect on the psyche of the street animal, may help a human understand the dynamics of the urban as perceived by the street animal.
Objectives
-
Identification of ‘narratives’ within the urban to understand negotiations which allow a coexisting arrangement. ‘Narratives’ being series of interaction stories emerging from field studies
-
Highlighting ‘enablers’ to establish the boundaries/doorways to understand the negotiations
-
Build comparisons amongst a handful of different typologies of spaces in the urban to speculate how the social arrangement exists at a macro scale (city level)
Research Methodology
Study Sample
-
Cluster sampling of the street animal(s) which is/are identified within the context of each narrative. (‘street animals’ limited to street dogs and street cats)
-
To include study of each individual from each sampled cluster
Drawing Strategy
-
40 odd narratives presented as elevational lengths which diagram the stage/scene/context where the interaction is ‘performed’.
-
Walkthroughs from the animal’s POV through a 3D representation of the context with nodes which metaphorically (and digitally) stain the environment with notions, perceptions, impressions.
-
Plans marking these notions, depicting the plethora of overlapping sensations, chart either the presumed actions of the animal, or provide proof for the animal’s behaviour.
-
Thermal comfort analysis of the spaces occupied by the animals and the site in general
-
Comparative chart highlighting key differences in perceptions.